What does the FCA’s recent Dear CEO letter mean for e-Money and payments institutions?

Gareth Mahoney, Moorwand Head of Compliance, writes for FinExtra about some of the key areas raised in the FCA's latest Dear CEO letter and explains what it means for EMIs and PIs

Gareth Mahoney, Head of Compliance at Moorwand

After uncovering a range of issues during recent visits to over 100 e-Money and payments institutions, the FCA published its latest ‘Dear CEO’ letter. The letter took a completely different approach to usual. Instead of focusing on a single area and then pushing for full compliance, the FCA broke down the many facets of a regulated firm and looked at them individually. This change in approach is almost certainly due to the widespread and endemic issues discovered at the EMIs and PIs being far beyond what the FCA had originally anticipated.

The letter ended with a stern warning – “we will act swiftly and decisively if you fail to meet our expectations” – but what are some of the key areas raised and what do they mean for EMIs and PIs? Let’s adopt the FCA’s approach and break down a few of the key areas one by one:

Safeguarding

The initial issue raised in the letter is safeguarding, which the FCA describes as ensuring customer funds are protected when a firm becomes insolvent.

But safeguarding is a thorny issue. Not least because the directives have ensured it can apply throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) – despite legal systems varying greatly from state to state. The point at which it applies is understood, but when it ceases is quite opaque. And the obligation to segregate relevant funds, while similar, is clearly different to safeguarding and needs clarity.

However, there’s also a responsibility on the industry to become more proactive around safeguarding client funds, which must happen sooner rather than later if the sector is to bolster confidence.

Prudential Risk Management

The second area discusses the need for adequate financial resource to ensure all firms can pay debts and meet obligations as required.

The need to do stress testing for liquidity and capital for PIs and EMIs is likely create additional burdens to an already heavily burdened industry. However, when a ‘black swan’ event, such as coronavirus, occurs stress testing could prove crucial to the survival of the fintech industry.

Here, the FCA also confirms that wind-down plans – when a firm considers how it may cease regulated activities with minimal adverse impact – should be proportionate to the size of the firm. This must be welcomed with open arms, as it will help firmly establish public confidence.

Financial Crime

The third area of focus is combatting and preventing financial crime. All firms must be conscious that their services could be used to facilitate fraud, money laundering, bribery and corruption and all manner of financial crimes.

As such, firms must ensure their processes are robust enough to survive this ever-changing environment. Careful supervision of EMI Agents is a priority, and ensuring all programme managers are adequately supervised is equally important.

In addition, high risk customers should always be reviewed sensitively and kept to a manageable size in a firm’s portfolio. But it is paramount that the management team regularly reviews the risk appetite in changing circumstances.

Financial promotions and consumer communications

Consumers rely on information promoted on websites and in adverts to make financial decisions about a firm’s products.

However, it’s always been the case that some firms will exploit their FCA regulated status. Unfortunately, this is more prevalent among EMI Agents wanting to use their statue to boost customer confidence. Firms must regularly check their own promotions, and those of their agents and programme managers, to ensure no such claims are made. And firms must treat their customers fairly, complying with industry guidance on unfair terms in consumer contracts.

Concluding thoughts

The FCA also calls out governance and reporting as other key areas firms must tighten their grip on, which speaks to the importance of regulated fintechs strengthening their business processes. There’s no denying that this letter will act as a wake-up call – if the Wirecard crisis hadn’t already, that is.

In the long-term these steps will help rebuild consumer and business confidence in working with fintechs that don’t have a banking license. That is assuming there are no further scandals in the short term while lawmakers turn consultations into policy.

The fintech industry has faced it’s sternest test yet with the global pandemic. The last thing it needs to do now is shoot itself in the foot.

The original article was published on the FinExtra Blog Forum on the 27th July 2020

Relevant posts

Luc Gueriane, Moorwand CCO, goes on the IBS Intelligence podcast to speak about whether COVID-19 will be the catalyst for the UK to fully embrace digital payments

Read more

Luc Gueriane speaks to The Fintech Times about why Starling Bank has been the only challenger bank to record more app downloads in May than the year before

Read more

Moorwand CCO Luc Gueriane writes for Fintech Futures - COVID-19: will fintechs crash, survive or get bought?

Read more